An argument against the smoking ban smoking in the united states of america

For example, some locations had previously implemented partial bans, and some regions within the locations studied for example, New York City and several other large counties in the New York state study had previously implemented comprehensive bans Juster et al.

Adult smokers who had previously attempted to quit were about 3 times odds ratio, 3. Workplace bans, state bans, and country bans have all shown a decrease in smoking behavior, whether the proportion who smoke or the magnitude of use is measured IOM, Tobacco Control 16 2: A recent study found that there was virtually no elevated health risk for people exposed to secondhand smoke in outdoor areas.

While there is ample evidence that being in a smoky indoor space exposes you to carcinogens, the same cannot be said about outdoor secondhand smoke.

Smoking Bans in the United States

Some anti-smoking advocates have now shifted their energies towards enacting even more wide-ranging smoking bans. Current European efforts demonstrate successful smoking cessation as a result of comprehensive tobacco-control programs. Recommendations for future studies are in Chapter 6.

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? How Far Are We Willing To Go?

This is increasingly the case. American Journal of Public Health 92 6: A Blueprint for the Nation IOM, concluded that comprehensive state tobacco programs can lead to substantial reductions in tobacco use.

Tobacco Control 11 Arguments Against A Public Smoking Ban But not everyone is enamored with the idea of prohibiting smoking in all public areas. The only argument not refuted outright at this point is the contention of the rise of gangs.

For example, some studies showed that increasing cigarette prices reduces demand for cigarettes IOM, IOM Institute of Medicine. Page Share Cite Suggested Citation: A typical smoker who is no longer allowed to smoke in a park on his lunch break will, on average, find the nearest alleyway to smoke in.

While this is perhaps true. Consider this contention mitigated. Cigarettes are, after all, perfectly legal to buy and smoke in the United States. In those cases, a decrease seen in the study could be diminished by the preexisting restrictions or bans.

WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, The study found a positive association between a national score on a tobacco-control scale and quitting ratios among all age—sex groups.

Compared with various other risks second hand smoke is relatively mild. Consider if you would the reality that by allowing harmful substances like tobacco to be legal, our society has monetized a human life.

In interpreting studies of smoking bans, especially in comparing results of different studies, it is important to consider the types and extent of different bans.Smoking bans encompass a severe form of collectivism that is beyond the scope in which the American form of Democratic government is intended.

The sole purpose of the United States government is a form of collectivism that is supposed to protect the rights of each individual: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Essay on Arguments For and Against a Smoking Ban. It was in that the Surgeon General of the United States first published a report on the ill-effects of smoking cigarettes, and within a year the first law requiring health warnings on cigarette packages was in effect.

Smoking Ban

More about Essay on Arguments For and Against a Smoking Ban. Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? How Far Are We Willing To Go? Arguments Against A Public Smoking Ban.

perfectly legal to buy and smoke in the United States. Ban opponents therefore argue that the government doesn’t have the authority to regulate what people do to their own bodies in a public, open-air.

Read chapter 5 The Background of Smoking Bans: Data suggest that exposure to secondhand smoke can result in heart disease in nonsmoking adults. including a brief discussion of the history of tobacco policies that led to bans and the current status of bans in the United States and globally.

it had formed as California GASP (Group Against. The National Cancer Institute, Surgeon General of the United States and National Institutes of Health all support smoking bans because of the statistics of second-hand smoke.”(4 th source round 2) A Ban likely does reduce smoking, and in the cases it doesn’t, allows justice to be served to those who are harming others.

Boston is far from alone. New York is banning smoking in parks.

Looking for other ways to read this?

California has banned it on many beaches. In much of sunny Los Angeles one can no longer smoke on restaurant patios. The entire town of Calabasas, California, is smoke-free in public places. San Francisco suburb San Rafael has banned smoking in all multi-unit residences.

An argument against the smoking ban smoking in the united states of america
Rated 0/5 based on 28 review